![]() ![]() ![]() “Kids are clearly deterred from participating by the stigma. ![]() In 2012, just 72% of eligible students in California participated in free or reduced lunch programs. But because of stigma, many eligible students choose not to eat the school’s lunch. ![]() Many countries, including Finland, India, Brazil, Japan, have seen their children become healthier and more responsible as a result.ġ5 ways to practice self-care in the time of coronavirusĬhildren whose families can’t afford to pack a lunch or to pay the standard price for one from the cafeteria have the option of free and reduced-price lunch- 29.4 million kids got fed this way at 100,000 schools in 2019, costing the federal government $14.1 billion. Kids who have access to lunch at school perform better academically and have better long-term health outcomes (pdf). There’s little question that such a program would benefit students. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |